Joshua Phares
Eng. 102, Laura Cline
Technology
I have had one other online class before this in Math. I had vowed to never take another online class because I felt I had a lot more homework from an online class than I would have if I did it in a classroom. I was pleasantly surprised by this class, although I am still debating whether or not I would have had less assignments had I taken it on campus. I really enjoyed the blogging aspect of this class and feel it was a great tool in getting to know the other students and helping us if we ever got stuck on something and needed a bit of guidance.
I think a challenge in taking an English course online is the absence of talking about reading materials as a class. I do like to read, but sometimes it would have been nice to be able to sit and have a discussion about what we had read. And even though we did have deadlines for our work, an online class makes it easier to take care of your business (whether family or job) and leaving the class to do on your own time.
The blogging was without a doubt the best part of the class. I’m not sure if I will continue to blog, but I am happy to say that I have done it. That was also the most beneficial part of the class because it helped me in a way that going to a classroom would have. The other students were like mini teachers when I needed help about where to go with an assignment. I do have to say that this class restored my doubtfulness with online classes and I am enrolled in another next semester. Thank you Ms. Cline for making this class interesting and going outside the box with the blogging!
Monday, December 5, 2011
Sunday, December 4, 2011
Thursday, December 1, 2011
Reflection on the Course
Reflection on the Course
Joshua Phares
Eng 102, Laura Cline
To be honest, this class has been a struggle for me. As much as I like to read, I found it hard to get motivated. I will admit that Frankenstein wasn’t as bad as I had first thought, but it’s hard to get into something (or a class) if it’s not your style of reading or if you dislike writing essays. I learned a great deal about MLA style format and wished that when I was in high school we would have learned it this way. It might have been easier to grasp and work through. I know that this class did prepare me for future classes where I may have to write an essay or letter. The way I go about getting ready to write an essay or anything for that matter, I take more time at and really try and use my words more effectively.
I am going to be a helicopter pilot, so I’m not sure if I will be writing a whole lot, but what I have learned has given me the knowledge I need to succeed in writing. And actually what I liked most about the class was reading everyone else’s blogs. It was nice to see such diversity, and it also helped when you got stumped and needed some guidance. I do wish I had used the tutoring for my essays, but I got done and am happy with my progress.
I want to thank Ms. Cline for all the help, your notes really helped me with the essays and your class really challenged me to step out of my comfort zone. Thank You!!
Sunday, November 13, 2011
Robotic Future
Joshua Phares Page 1
Eng 102, Laura Cline
Final Essay
Robotic Future
Do you think it’s scary that one day your job can be taken over by a robot? For some this is a fear, for others this is already a reality. I am going to dive into the reality that technology is ever revolving and robots are no longer just on episodes of The Jetsons, but very soon, could be on our front door step.
In 2004, Twentieth Century Fox made a movie based off of the book by Isaac Asmov, I, Robot. This movie is set in 2035 and shows a world where robots are used as servants and public helpers. These robots look human like and basically do what the human does not want to do; run errands, clean house, watch the kids, etc. The robots live by 3 rules, as detailed in Asmov’s book and the movie, I, Robot;
1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey the orders that come to it by human beings, except when such orders conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws. (Strickland, 2005)
The reason for the laws is to protect the humans. In the movie, Will Smith’s character, Del Spooner, is in an accident where several cars crash into the water. A robot jumps in and assesses
Page 2
that Spooner is a better bet to save over a 12 year old girl. This is law number 1. Thus begins the story line where Spooner fights to not give control over to the robots. He sees that little by little humans are becoming extinct in a sense. In that world, cars are not manually driven, you don’t have to manually turn on equipment in your home or office and day to day activities can be done by robots. Spooner believes that these robots are developing on their own and can get around the 3 laws.
These robots are portrayed as secondary citizens. They have a human like appearance and do almost everything that a human does, but they do not have all the rights.
In Asmov’s book, the beginning describes the robots simply as mechanical designs that flourish and evolve into each successive generation. By the end of the book, the robots are more human like. (Asmov) Is this where we are headed? In our society I have not seen anywhere that has a human like robot, that is not to say they do not exist, but in our day and age we are obviously not at the point where every household has one. I do believe we are headed in this direction, I just don’t think we will see it by 2035. It worries me that we have all become so dependent on technology. Now don’t get me wrong, I was the first of my friends to have a cell phone, but a cell phone doesn’t have the power or possibility of taking my job or taking my life.
What I fear is that eventually we can be overrun by robots. In my paper, robots represent a future where we have no manual control and our life starts becoming predestined. What happens when you give someone control over something? Well, frankly you no longer are in the driver’s seat and you are not in control. That person has that situation in their hands. Now insert a robot and give them control of our day to day living. What you have is a life predetermined by robots. In the movie, Spooner lived in a way where he was in control. He drove his car and motorcycle
Page 3
manually, his apartment was not controlled by voice controls or anything robotic. What he saw, people were blinded by.
What bothers me about robots coming into our future is that there will be someone controlling them. Who is to say who makes the rules or laws for these creatures? Does one person, a panel or a company? In the movie, a certain scientist was able to create a robot that had feelings and was able to operate without using the 3 laws, something no one believed except Spooner. In the below excerpt, Spooner is talking with an employee where the scientist (Alfred) was just killed by the robot he created. We later learn that this robot was told to do this, so the correct information can be received that robots can have emotions.
Susan Calvin: I don't understand. Alfred wrote the Three Laws. Why would he build a robot that could break them?
Detective Del Spooner: Hansel and Gretel.
Susan Calvin: What?
Detective Del Spooner: Two kids, lost in the forest. Leave behind a trail of bread crumbs.
Susan Calvin: Why?
Detective Del Spooner: To find their way home. How the hell did you grow up without reading Hansel and Gretel?
Susan Calvin: Is that really relevant?
Detective Del Spooner: Everything I'm trying to say to you is about Hansel and Gretel. You didn't read it, I'm talking to the wall.
Susan Calvin: Okay. Okay.
Page 4
Detective Del Spooner: All right, look, just say Lanning was locked down so tight he couldn't get out a message. All he could do was leave me clues, like a trail of bread crumbs.
Susan Calvin: Bread crumbs equals clues. Odd but fine. Clues leading where?
Detective Del Spooner: I don't know, but I think I know where he left the next one. I think Lanning gave Sonny a way to keep secrets. I think the old man gave Sonny dreams. (Imdb, 2004)
Another interesting tid bit about the above excerpt is that when we allow technology to take over our lives we miss out of information we would have known otherwise. Calvin didn’t even know about a childhood tale because she has only been given technological advanced information. Is this another piece of future we need to prepare for? Are our children’s children’s children not going to know about the nursery rhymes we grew up with? Are they not going to know about 9-11 or even the Chicago Bulls domination in the 1990’s?
I, Robot actually has a great comparison to Frankenstein. You have a scientist that creates a “monster” because they wanted to make a difference and even though in Frankenstein, the monster turns and goes bad, it’s a creation and a spark of genius in itself.
Lt. John Bergin: I've been thinking. This thing's like the Wolfman.
Detective Del Spooner: Uh-oh, I'm really scared, John.
Lt. John Bergin: No, seriously. Guy creates monster. Monster kills guy. Everyone kills monster. Wolfman.
Detective Del Spooner: That's Frankenstein.
Lt. John Bergin: Frankenstein, Wolfman, Dracula, shit, it's over. (Imdb, 2004)
Page 5
Now not to say that I am against having any robots in my future, I just hope we never get to the point where we rely solely on them. In another article I came across, this discussed our past, present and future involving them. This article contends that robots are used for jobs that are deemed unsafe for humans.
Today, robots are doing human labor in all kinds of places. Best of all, they are doing the jobs that are unhealthy or impractical for people. This frees up workers to do the more skilled jobs, including the programming, maintenance and operation of robots. Robots that work on cars and trucks are welding and assembling parts, or lifting heavy parts --the types of jobs that involve risks like injury to your back and arm or wrist, or they work in environments filled with hazards like excessive heat, noise or fumes-dangerous places for people. Robots that assemble and pack cookies or other foodstuff do so without the risk of carpal tunnel injury, unlike their human counterparts. Robots that make computer chips are working in such tiny dimensions that a person couldn't even do some of the precision work required. In the health industry, robots are helping to research and develop drugs, package them and even assist doctors in complicated surgery such as hip replacement and open heart procedures. And the main reason robots are used in any application is because they do the work so much better that there is a vast improvement in quality and/or production, or costs are brought down so that companies can be the best at what they do while keeping workers safe. (Huse, Robotics Online)
In a perfect world for me, we will have advanced technology beyond anyone’s wildest dreams, but we will also control how we live. These robots represent a probable future, but a scary one at
Page 6
that. This tale of the future questions whether technology will ultimately lead to mankind’s salvation…or annihilation. (I, Robot, 2004)
Asimov, Isaac. “I, Robot”. Random House Publishing Group. April 2008
“I, Robot”. Twentienth Century Fox. 2004
Huse, Brian. “How Robots will Affect Future Generations”. Robotic Industries Association.
12-13-01
“Memorable Quotes for I, Robot”. The Internet Movie Database. 2004. www.imdb.com
Strickland, Gary. “Your portal to the world of Speculative Fiction”. 2005.
www.templetongate.net.
Sunday, November 6, 2011
Work Cited for Final
Joshua Phares
Eng. 102, Laura Cline
Fall 2011
Asimov, Isaac. “I, Robot”. Random House Publishing Group. April 2008
In this book, Isaac writes about robots as a technology that as much as it would be beneficial to our society, could also bring it crashing down. This book takes place after World War II and how the world was obsessed with the growth of technology. He talks about how robots were used to take over some day to day operations from humans to help, but they gave such power and intellect to them, that they became so smart, they started to take over. I am using this source as a basis for my argument about robots. We are humans rely so much on technology and something such as robots are starting to take the place of us in society.
“I, Robot”. Twentieth Century Fox Pictures. 2004
This feature film starring Will Smith is loosely based off of the above book. The story is based around the “3 Laws” that robots cannot harm a human and must obey humans. The question I would like to take from this movie is whether technology will ultimately lead to mankind’s salvation or annihilation. This is obviously futuristic, so I plan on writing about how technology is in today’s world and what to expect in the future, or even hope for.
Huse, Brian. “How Robots Will Affect Future Generations”. Robotic Industries Association. Published 12/13/2001. www.robotics.org.
This is an article that focuses on bringing light to the fact that technology runs our society and how robots are an asset even in today’s society. It touches on the past and present in robotics as well as what to expect in the future. I used this article as more of a scientific point of view. It doesn’t talk about robots as in walking, talking robots to mimic humans; it’s more of a technological view on how robotics can control our lives. It isn’t all bad; robotics does make things easier for us and has enabled us to succeed in many areas. I will also touch on the great advances we have come across because of robotics.
Monday, October 31, 2011
Final Project
Final Project
I chose to do option 2 only because it made more sense to me. I do like to read, but the thought of doing something out of the ordinary appealed to me more. I had a hard time choosing between vampires or robots. One of my favorite shows is True Blood, but I thought that might be a popular topic between that show and all those Twi-hards, so I went with robots.
My primary source will be a book titled, I, Robot by Isaac Asimov. I had to do a bit of research to find a book about Robots that act like humans and could possibly take over the world. I am still looking for articles, short stories, etc., but I believe this will be a great book. I am also using the movie, I, Robot as my secondary source. This is a movie that I thoroughly enjoy and I am excited to write about it.
I hope to accomplish a great grade to finish out the semester, but I also hope to turn a paper about robots into a solid essay. I want to make it as professional and well-rounded as possible and I want to make it sound like I know what I am talking about! I will use whatever sources I can find that will help me accomplish my goals. There are a lot of cheesy sources out there about robots, well, monsters in general, so I think a big task for everyone who chooses this topic will have to be careful.
Sincerely,
Josh Phares
http://www.google.com/imgres?q=Picture+of+I,+Robot&hl=en&sa=X&qscrl=1&nord=1&rlz=1T4SNNT_enUS415US415&biw=1366&bih=530&tbm=isch&prmd=imvns&tbnid=9je68IhRfGq5_M:&imgrefurl=http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/apr/10/robot.brain&docid=ScdTjD2IdfBTMM&imgurl=http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Technology/Pix/pictures/2008/04/09/Irobot460x276.jpg&w=460&h=276&ei=fkeuTu2wEo-EsAL_3NmUDw&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=1029&vpy=153&dur=452&hovh=174&hovw=290&tx=178&ty=86&sig=100945518438904738055&page=1&tbnh=125&tbnw=213&start=0&ndsp=13&ved=1t:429,r:4,s:0
Sunday, October 23, 2011
Letter
Dear Ms. Cline,
If I can be honest, this class is not my cup of tea. I am an older student and how we wrote essays and papers in high school is completely different than how we are required now. MLA format was hard for me to get and I still struggle with certain aspects of it. I consider myself an avid reader, just not the type of books we read in this class. I will admit after I finish reading an assignment, I do find myself intrigued to a certain point. It does take me out of my comfort zone and I feel like it broadens my understanding and the way I perceive things. It’s making me a worldly reader. I feel that I can look deeper into a story and find more intricate meanings behind what is going on. Perhaps I look into a story too much, so this could also be a certain downfall for me also.
My goal for the second half of the session is to finish up strong. It’s hard to stay focused sometimes when you have to go into such detail about something you may not completely understand or frankly care to understand. This class is very important to me and I look forward to finishing!
Sincerely,
Joshua Phares
Sunday, October 9, 2011
Female Gothic: The Monster's Mother
Female Gothic: The Monster’s Mother
By Ellen Moers
I chose to write about Ellen Moers article, Female Gothic: The Monster’s Mother mainly because after reading through it, it made me see the Frankenstein differently as well as the author, Mary Shelley. Moers thinks that Shelley paved the way for not only female authors, but all authors in how they write about horror. She touched on Shelley’s own tumultuous past, her heartache with children and her uneasy path that started off being a mistress. Shelley started writing Frankenstein at the young age of 18 and just like in the article, it states, “Passive reflections, however, do not produce original works of literature, and Frankenstein, if not a great novel, was unquestionably an original one”. (Moers page 219) She did something no other writers, female or male were doing.
I definitely see Frankenstein in a different light. After now knowing a bit of Shelley’s history, I believe she made a lot of hidden meanings behind her story. She lost a lot of children, not by choice, but I believe she felt like they were taken from her. In Frankenstein, the creator just left. You work and work for something and then it happens and he chose to leave. He had that choice and I believe she wishes she had that choice.
I am undecided about if I will use this for my 3rd essay. It is a bit of a reach for me, but it is very interesting.
Work cited:
Moers, Ellen. Female Gothic: The Monsters Mother. 1976 Moer’s Literacy Women
Sunday, September 18, 2011
What I See (The Tyger)
Joshua Phares
Eng. 102, Laura Cline
Fall 2011
What I See
I chose the poem, “The Tyger”, by William Blake for this essay. What I didn’t count on was how difficult this poem was to interpret. For someone like myself, who prefers something to be cut and dry, this was out of my comfort zone. This poem was very simply written, but included such depth and hopefully my understanding will make sense with what the author had intended.
When I picture someone reading this, I see someone that is angry and confused with life. When he says, “What immortal hand or eye, could frame thy fearful symmetry”? (The Tyger, lines 3-4) He is stating how the Tyger is such a feared animal and is wondering who could create such a creature. When he mentions the word “immortal”, he is referencing the creator as someone who thinks of themselves as fire proof or invincible. This animal, as big as it may be, doesn’t seem to shed any fear from its creator. The creator may not see The Tyger the same way the author does. Perhaps the Tyger is a sign of dominance and power, but not aggressiveness.
I also see the writer/narrator as someone of a bit of a worrier. He states:
In what distant deeps or skies.
Burnt the fire of thine eyes?
On what wings dare he aspire?
What the hand, dare seize the fire?
And what shoulder, & what art,
Could twist the sinews of thy heart?
And when the heart began to beat,
What dread hand? & what dread feet?
(The Tyger, lines 5-12)
When I read these lines, my first thought is, they are all questions. This is why I think of the narrator as someone who worries or appears anxious. When he asks, “what wings dare he aspire?” (The Tyger, line 7), I see that as someone asking How Dare He?! What gives this person the right to take something so dangerous into his own hands? Now I know he is talking about God, as the creator, but I do not think he gets to that point until the end when he reads, “Did he who made the Lamb make thee?” (The Tyger, line 20) Now Lamb can be taken simply as an animal or it can be taken in the biblical term. I truly believe he meant for it to be biblical, mainly because it’s capitalized and he is referencing to the one who created the Lamb.
I see the poem as a question to God about why he not only created the Tyger (a big, dangerous animal), but also anything bad in the world. How is it that someone can create something so beautiful and peaceful, but also have a hand in all things bad in the world? The author also asks God, “In what furnace was thy brain?” (The Tyger, line 14) He pretty much bluntly asks him, how in your right mind could you have created something so fearful? Were you in the right state of mind when doing so? Being a Christian myself, I know what I believe, but I see this narrator as someone who struggles with his own beliefs. He actually questions God when he writes, “When the stars threw down their spears and water’d heaven with their tears: Did he smile his work to see?” (The Tyger, lines 17-19) Well of course he doesn’t smile when he sees war, fighting, murder, jealousy, cruelty… He does however smile when he sees something good come out of bad. I believe he does smile at a creature like the Tyger. It, along with all humans, was created by Him, from Him. There is a piece of good in everyone and everything and what you choose or what nature allows is what we see.
The Tyger in this poem I think gets a bad rap because of what it is known for; its size, strength and fearful reputation. He could very well have written this story about a Great White Shark or Grizzly Bear, but the Tyger had significance with the author. I don’t think we will necessarily know what that is, but someone about this creature brings the onset of questions that he asks. Something triggers his uneasiness with what God has created.
The last paragraph, even though it is a repeat of the first paragraph holds the most meaning. It’s like the writer never got the answer that he was searching for. He repeats it back almost hesitantly, wondering if his questions will ever be answered. I truly believe this poem actually has nothing to do with a Tyger, but more to do about life. Why do bad things happen to good people? Why do we have war? If we were all molded alike, why are we all so different? I don’t think you know yourself until you ask yourself certain questions, until you know what you believe in. This poem is simply his question about God. Does he believe or doesn’t he, that is the question.
WORK CITED:
Blake, William. “The Tyger”. Printed by The Poetry Foundation, www.poetryfoundation.org.
September 18, 2011.
Sunday, September 11, 2011
Poetry
I read all the poems repeatedly and there were only two that I had any relation to,if that’s what you can call it. The one that I could somewhat understand only after reading it several times was “The Tyger” written by William Blake. The lines that stood out the most were
“When the stars threw down their spears,
And watered Heaven with their tears,
Did he smile his work to see?
Did he who made the lamb make thee?”
To me this is referring to when the tiger came into being, and the poet’s questioning of how he who created the lamb, an animal so peaceful and unassuming; could have also created an animal so awe inspiring but also so frightening. The tiger is the polar opposite of the lamb. A tiger in the wild is definitely something to be feared, the beast could easily dispatch a man or its usual prey with ease. So why was the tiger created and by whom if not him then surely the other? This poem has to be talking about religion and the authors confusion as to why something as seemingly vicious as the tiger would be dreamt up along with some of the less dangerous “creations”. Then again I suppose I could be way off.
Sunday, September 4, 2011
Summary V Analysis
Summary is something we all have done if we have ever done a book report. I know this was said in the
video lecture, repatedly but, it is a good example of summary. Analysis is something I have personally
not done a whole lot of. Analysis is an in depth study and re-reading of the text so one can better produce
their argument. Analysis requires that the reader be objective to whatever they are reading, taking notes
using other materials of research to be able to make their argument the best it can possibly be. If
the person doing the analysis of the text is successful said person will have readers of their analysis
disagree with them, or have them looking at the studied text in a whole new light. A summary in comparison
to analysis would be like carpet bombing as opposed to laser guided missiles. A summary might get the
job done, but a laser guided missile (analysis) is more to the point.
video lecture, repatedly but, it is a good example of summary. Analysis is something I have personally
not done a whole lot of. Analysis is an in depth study and re-reading of the text so one can better produce
their argument. Analysis requires that the reader be objective to whatever they are reading, taking notes
using other materials of research to be able to make their argument the best it can possibly be. If
the person doing the analysis of the text is successful said person will have readers of their analysis
disagree with them, or have them looking at the studied text in a whole new light. A summary in comparison
to analysis would be like carpet bombing as opposed to laser guided missiles. A summary might get the
job done, but a laser guided missile (analysis) is more to the point.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
